|
Copyright
Robert E. Bear
“Art” means different things to various people.
It's been an enigma! Since the age of twelve I wanted
to be an "artist". Over the years I had
become involved with numerous "art" endeavors:
drawings, sculptures, paintings in various media,
architectural design, photography, writing, and
ceramics. I've even been fortunate to have "art"
jobs: art and photography teacher, freelance artist,
supervisor of a graphic art department, museum exhibits
designer and builder, and art director. In all those
experiences and even through educational training
beyond the master's degree I could not find a comprehensive
definition of..."art". Afterall, I was
an "artist"; but, how could I make claim
to this intreguing group with out really knowing
what "art" was?
In the early 1990's,
I participated in the Improving Visual Art Education
Conference in Cincinnati, Ohio, which was sponsored
by the Cincinnati Art Museum and the Getty Center
for the Arts. The conference basically centered around
the concept of "Discipline Based Art Education".
In this realm arts education is believed to
have four basic tenants that should be covered in
pedagogy and help give credence to spending constrainted
budgets on having "arts" in the public
school curriculum. These four areas are: history,
theory/criticism, aesthetics, and production. It
was from this conference that I came up with the
design for the MIA
PATCH Lesson Plan
for the Arts since there was no lesson plan format
that I new of that really fit the "arts"
education arena. One of the speakers, and I forget
her name, was an aesthetics professor from the University
of Minnesota. She came the closest to a definition
of art that I could agree with, except, for her,
art had to have a concrete artifact, an art
"object", something tangible to be
reviewed through time. But, as many "artists"
know, sometimes an artistic creation is designed
to be fugitive, non-tangible through time, it must
disappear to fulfill its aesthetic intent.
While out jogging
one afternoon at the conference it came to me, an
epiphany; " There is a simple, comprehensive definition
of "art", it's an acronym for itself".
The Aesthetic Rendering of Thought.
In order for Art to exist, the following three (3) criteria must be met. First of all, there must be some sensory manifestation (Rendering), fugitive or permanent, that is based upon a creative, intellectual process (Thought) with the intention of a beautiful or pleasurable (Aesthetic or Anti-aesthetic) action, or reaction, in one or more of the senses and/or psyche.
Encircled within
this definition are more than the traditional concepts
of "art": painting, sculpture, ceramics,
writing, architecture, drama, music, dance, and
photography. It's now easier to understand why cooking
can be included as an "art" and more
than just a craft. Please do not confuse "craft"
with "art". Art objects are original creations,
one of a kind. Craft, on the other hand, is the
fastidious copying, reproduction, of an art object.
|